I had this same situation and fixed it by doing adding the policy from the SSL.vpn interface to the IPsec tunnel interface and then from the IPsec tunnel interface back to the SSL.vpn interface. The issue is what interfaces the traffic is allowed on. It will not hairpin to an interface that is not defined in a policy.
I would stick with IPSec. More control and secure. Also, with Cisco released 64bit client version for IPsec, no need to spend for SSL licensing. Also, incase if you decide to upgrade IOS on ASAs to a newer version like 8.3, I read postings about some complex 'nat' statements. IPsec would be my choice. Lets see what gurus say. thanks. MS IPSec (Internet Protocol Security) and SSL (Secure Socket Layer) are both tools used to ensure the data being transmitted is encrypted. For VPN access, IPSec is the better choice for permanent OpenVPN is an SSL VPN and as such is not compatible with IPSec, L2TP, or PPTP. The IPSec protocol is designed to be implemented as a modification to the IP stack in kernel space, and therefore each operating system requires its own independent implementation of IPSec. This is a sample configuration of site-to-site IPsec VPN that allows access to the remote endpoint via SSL VPN. This example uses a pre-existing user group, a tunnel mode SSL VPN with split tunneling, and a route-based IPsec VPN between two FortiGates. All sessions must start from the SSL VPN interface. May 13, 2019 · Implementing IPSEC. In this example, we will set up IPSEC to encrypt communications between two windows machines. The first machine, a windows 2012 server will act as the VPN server. The second machine, a Windows 10 client, will act as the VPN client. A LT2P IPSEC VPN can exchange either a pre-shared key or a certificate. IPsec is a Layer 3 VPN: For both network-to-network and remote-access deployments, an encrypted Layer 3 tunnel is established between the peers. An SSL VPN, in contrast, is typically a remote-access technology that provides Layer 6 encryption services for Layer 7 applications and, through local redirection on the client, tunnels other TCP
What is an SSL Certificate? SSL stands for Secure Sockets Layer and, in short, it's the standard technology for keeping an internet connection secure and safeguarding any sensitive data that is being sent between two systems, preventing criminals from reading and modifying any information transferred, including potential personal details.
I would stick with IPSec. More control and secure. Also, with Cisco released 64bit client version for IPsec, no need to spend for SSL licensing. Also, incase if you decide to upgrade IOS on ASAs to a newer version like 8.3, I read postings about some complex 'nat' statements. IPsec would be my choice. Lets see what gurus say. thanks. MS IPSec (Internet Protocol Security) and SSL (Secure Socket Layer) are both tools used to ensure the data being transmitted is encrypted. For VPN access, IPSec is the better choice for permanent
I had this same situation and fixed it by doing adding the policy from the SSL.vpn interface to the IPsec tunnel interface and then from the IPsec tunnel interface back to the SSL.vpn interface. The issue is what interfaces the traffic is allowed on. It will not hairpin to an interface that is not defined in a policy.
but do SSL and IPSec use different key schemes and algorithms from another to establish contexts? Well, given that, by IPsec, you mean only AH and ESP (that is, RFC4301-4303), well, the obvious answer is that IPsec doesn't mandate any way to generate keys, select algorithms, or to establish contexts. Both SSL and IPSec VPNs are good options, both with considerable security pedigree, although they may suit different applications. IPsec VPNs operate at layer 3 (network), and in a typical deployment give full access to the local network (although access can be locked down via firewalls and some VPN servers support ACLs). Comparing SonicWall SSL VPN & Global IPSec VPN services can be complicated. Both forms of remote access can provide secure connections for users, but they deliver this access in different ways. How Global IPsec VPN & SSL VPN services differ depends on which layers of the network that authentication, encryption, & distribution of data occurs. SSL VPNs and IPSec VPNs can coexist, says Current Analysis. SSL VPNs are a killer solution for providing application access outside the corporate firewall, while IPSec VPNs are better suited for SRX Series,vSRX. IPsec VPN Overview, IPsec VPN Topologies on SRX Series Devices, Comparison of Policy-Based VPNs and Route-Based VPNs, Understanding IKE and IPsec Packet Processing, Understanding Phase 1 of IKE Tunnel Negotiation, Understanding Phase 2 of IKE Tunnel Negotiation, Supported IPsec and IKE Standards, Understanding Distributed VPNs in SRX Series Services Gateways , Understanding SSL VPN (Secure Sockets Layer virtual private network): An SSL VPN (Secure Sockets Layer virtual private network) is a form of VPN that can be used with a standard Web browser. In contrast to the